My Question of the Day: You are in an extremely bad accident. You also happen to have an extremely rare blood type. The doctors are doing all they can to repair the damage to your body, and they discover you must have a blood transfusion or their efforts will be in vain. During all of their life-saving measures, you are conscious and responsive, so you’re able to communicate with the hospital staff.

The head of the medical staff appears to give you good news and bad news. The bad news, she tells you, is that the hospital doesn’t have enough of your blood type within the mileage radius that it can be brought in to save you before you bleed to death. The good news, she says, is that there is one person in the hospital who has the same, extremely rare blood type as you, who is willing to donate his blood.

The issue is that the willing donor has an incurable, but NOT deadly disease. She asks you if you want to take your chances without the blood transfusion, or if you want to accept the only blood that will guarantee you a full recovery from  your injuries but will also leave you with an incurable, but NOT deadly, disease for the rest of your life.

What do you do?

RULES FOR COMMENTS

1. DO NOT include links in your post. There is a place for you to include one link when you’re filling out the Name/Email/Website information. Comments that include links will be deleted.

2. If your post is obviously irrelevant to the question at hand, it will be deleted. This is a tactic spammers use to simply show up on blogs.

3. Please keep your comments respectful. We can agree to disagree without attacking each other.

The Question: Should people put photos/videos of the children in their lives on non-password-protected websites?

My 2 Cents: Start by reading Guardians of Their Smiles if you think it’s paranoia to believe others will use the images/videos of your children.

The internet has made it possible for us to share images of ourselves and our family members with others around the globe. This isn’t a bad thing. Actually, it’s a very good thing and it’s cost-effective to boot.

However, people should not put photos/videos of the children in their lives on non-password-protected websites. That’s simply too much exposure for our little ones.

Maybe this is a stretch, so please feel free to comment in the opposite perspective or point of view if you happen to absolutely disagree with me, but I assert that we violate our children’s right to privacy when we plaster their image all over the web. We take away their right to choose their own “cyber” image when we make that choice for them before they can make it for themselves. It’s almost as bad as taking out credit cards in your child’s name, because you’ve ruined  your credit.

Share your pictures and videos with close friends and family members through secure, password-protected, limited-access channels, where you have control over who sees the images/videos, and where you also have some control over how those images/videos are used. This means you MUST read the terms of service stipulations for third-party sites where you post images/videos. However, do not put images/video of your precious little ones anywhere on the web where anyone, whether their intent for viewing and/or using your images/video is for good or for bad, has access to them. You could possibly be setting up yourself, and even your child, for challenges that are avoidable.

Think before you share, and think how you share.

———-

Take a few moments to check out the tweets from Twitter on this subject:

———-

EpicView_SP I say they shouldn’t. Children’s privacy should be guarded. You never know how people might try to use the photos/videos.

Mitch_M Children; I’m not really sure one way or the other.

PROTECTED TWEETER not in this day…absolutely NOT. This world has too many predators out there to expose your children like that.

ankomaguy NO

FeminaPrudentia That’s a tough one. The ones I think should NOT be up at all are the ones w/the kids “dirty dancing”. “Slow wine” NOT cool! ‘

jazzzyone I wouldnt

Speaklife2 I see no harm in it…

queenesther Of course not. That’s just not the kind of world we live in. (Those pics could be used for a high $ ad campaign, for ex.)

shoopeeshoop depending on what kind of site it is and the kind of pic or video they are sharing I think it is up to the parent’s judgment.

LadyJay91 I don’t have a rock solid yes or no on your QOD..the world is such a funky mess, I guess it’s best to be safe than sorry.

PROTECTED TWEETER ..I believe that they shouldn’t..

rishaholmes We must be very careful with pictures of children, and too much info on the web, the world is not nice sometimes…

ObiOrion Yes they should. They should also never complain should they come across those same images/movies elsewhere online.

PROTECTED TWEETER I guess it depends on the intent. My fam usually does it w/o passwords to let other family members see. Good ???

Pettra88 Sure…fully clothed. As long as they know it’s out there now for any one to use. Anyone.

md20737 im actually forbidden to tweet my childs picture by his dad. he says its unsafe and I agree

NightShade10 With events as they are, and crimes against children my vote is no. I took mine down for that reason – my children’s safety.

sunshine625 If u got em flaunt em

———-

The commentary doesn’t have to end!

Please feel free to continue to add your comments to the original post by clicking here.